Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 4.
Published in final edited form as: J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 May 2;99(9):738. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djk163

Table 1.

Cox regression analysis of disease-free and overall survival in relation to median p27 and cyclin E expression (n = 2020)*

Marker Unadjusted HR (95% CI) Adjusted HR (95% CI) Adjusted HR (95% CI) Adjusted/negative receptors§ HR (95% CI) Adjusted/positive receptors§ HR (95% CI)
Disease-free survival
p27 1.31 (1.10 to 1.57) 1.32 (1.10 to 1.57) 1.18 (0.98 to 1.42) 1.06 (0.81 to 1.39) 1.27 (0.99 to 1.63)
cyclin E 1.09 (0.92 to 1.29) 1.13 (0.95 to 1.34) 1.02 (0.85 to 1.22) 0.95 (0.74 to 1.21) 1.13 (0.88 to 1.46)
Overall survival
p27 1.50 (1.21 to 1.86) 1.51 (1.22 to 1.87) 1.31 (1.05 to 1.64) 1.19 (0.86 to 1.64) 1.42 (1.05 to 1.94)
cyclin E 1.12 (0.91 to 1.38) 1.17 (0.95 to 1.44) 1.03 (0.83 to 1.27) 0.87 (0.65 to 1.16) 1.25 (0.92 to 1.71)
*

HR = hazard ratio; CI = confidence interval. Overall survival was defined as the time to death from any cause. Disease-free survival was defined as the time to first recurrence (local, regional, or distant), new primary cancer in the contralateral breast, or death due to any cause.

Analyses were adjusted for tumor size (<2 cm, 2–5 cm, or >5 cm), number of positive lymph nodes (0, 1, 2, or 3), menopausal status, and randomized treatment but not receptor status.

Analyses were adjusted for tumor size (<2 cm, 2–5 cm, or >5 cm), number of positive lymph nodes (0, 1, 2, or 3), menopausal status, randomized treatment, and receptor status (both estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor negative vs. either positive).

§

Analyses were adjusted for tumor size, number of positive lymph nodes, menopausal status, and treatment and then separately analyzed by receptor status.