Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 4;93:104084. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104084

Table 2.

Descriptive Statistics and Summary Results for Main Dependent Variables.

Contexts and Conditions DV N M SD SE Mean b SE t df Cohen's d p 95% CI (LL, UL)
Context A

Challenge Lack of Restrictions Acceptance of Shaming 83 2.27 1.49 0.16 -1.20 0.25 -4.90 164 0.76 <.0001 -1.69 -0.72
Challenge Health Restrictions 83 3.47 1.67 0.18
Challenge Lack of Restrictions Perceived Tweet Civility 83 2.34 1.39 0.15 -0.98 0.24 -4.11 164 0.64 <.0001 -1.44 -0.51
Challenge Health Restrictions 83 3.31 1.66 0.18
Challenge Lack of Restrictions Moral Outrage
83 2.18 1.31 0.14 -1.54
0.24
-6.45
164
1.00
<.0001
-2.01
-1.07
Challenge Health Restrictions 83 3.72 1.73 0.19




Context B

OVER-estimate C19 Demotion 78 3.95 2.94 0.33 -1.52 0.50 -3.02 153 0.49 0.0029 -2.51 -0.52
UNDER-estimate C19 77 5.47 3.31 0.38
OVER-estimate C19 Pay Deduction 77 10.40 9.52 1.08 -4.95 1.52 -3.23 153 0.53 0.0013 -7.95 -1.96
UNDER-estimate C19 78 15.40 9.37 1.06
OVER-estimate C19 Moral Outrage
79 5.08 1.30 0.15 -0.57
0.19
-2.91
156
0.46
0.0041
-0.95
-0.18
UNDER-estimate C19 79 5.64 1.14 0.13




Context C

Power Abuse for C19 Demotion 81 3.19 1.60 0.18 -0.88 0.28 -3.16 161 0.50 0.0019 -1.42 -0.33
Power Abuse for Road Safety 82 4.06 1.92 0.21
Power Abuse for C19 Pay Deduction 79 3.29 4.46 0.42 -1.77 0.66 -2.69 156 0.43 0.0077 -3.07 -0.48
Power Abuse for Road Safety 79 5.06 3.77 0.50
Power Abuse for C19 Moral Outrage 81 4.18 1.62 0.18 -0.58 0.25 -2.30 161 0.36 0.0226 -1.07 -0.08
Power Abuse for Road Safety 82 4.76 1.57 0.17

Notes. All results were statistically significant even after correcting for multiple tests (i.e., for Context A and C that each had 5 DVs, we use α = 0.05 /5 = .01; for Context B with 6 DVs, we use α = 0.05 / 6 = 0.0083), except for moral outrage in Context C, which is not a pre-registered main DV.