Table 3.

Relationship between change in HAMD and baseline FA in ESC/MEM and ESC/PBO.

FA	Left			Right
	Interaction group x FA	ESC+MEM	ESC+PBO	Interaction group x FA	ESC+MEM	ESC+PBO
HAMD
ALIC	F(1, 18) = 4.66, p = 0.04*	T = −3.63, p = 0.002; r = −0.77	T = −0.56, p = 0.58	F(1, 18)= 7.7, p = 0.01*	T = −5.11, p ≤ 0001; r = −0.78	T = −0.76, p = 0.45
PLIC	F(1, 18) = 7.71, p = 0.01	T = −2.73, p = 0.01; r = −0.51	T = 1.35, p = 0.19	F(1, 18)= 5.76, p = 0.03*	T = −1.84, p = 0.08; r = −0.31	T = 1.09, p = 0.29
CGC	F(1, 18) = 0.34, p = 0.56			F(1, 18)= 2.11, p = 0.16
IFO	F(1, 18) = 4.65, p = 0.04*	T = −2.57, p = 0.02; r = −0.59	T = 0.23, p = 0.82	F(1, 18) = 4.69, p = 0.04*	T = −3.58, p = 0.002; r = −0.63	T = 0.18, p = 0.86
SFO	F(1, 18) = 0.17, p = 0.69			F(1, 18)= 8.48, p = 0.009**	T = −3.63, p = 0.002; r = −0.75	T = −0.04, p = 0.97
SLF	F(1, 18) = 1.49, p = 0.24			F(1, 18)= 3.31, p = 0.09
FX	F(1, 18) = 0.24, p = 0.63			F(1, 18)= 0.01, p = 0.94
FX Body	Interaction: F(1, 18) = 0.06, p = 0.80
GCC	Interaction: F(1, 18) = 0.13, p = 0.73

The results stem from the rank-based general linear models including the treatment group, FA and the interaction between group and FA as the predictors, while controlling for the respective baseline score, age, sex and scanner.

HAMD, Hamilton Depression Scale.

^*Significant after FDR correction.