Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 20;22(11):e22036. doi: 10.2196/22036

Table 3.

Mean and median scores for the nonadoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, and sustainability subdomain barriers and enablers, as reported by responders.

Barrier or enabler Scorea

Mean (SD)b Median (IQR)
The adopter system (n=390)


Changes in staff roles, practices, and identities 4.32 (1.25) 4.33 (3.33-5.00)
The organization


Organization’s capacity to innovate (n=382) 5.25 (1.00) 5.50 (4.67-6.00)

Readiness of the organization for technology-supported change (n=386) 4.88 (1.03) 5.00 (4.25-5.75)

Ease of the adoption and funding decision (n=387) 5.22 (1.31) 6.00 (4.00-6.00)

Changes needed in team interactions and routines (n=389) 3.52 (1.30) 3.50 (2.50-4.00)

Identifying work and individuals involved in implementation (n=389) 4.35 (1.19) 4.00 (4.00-5.00)
The wider context (n=389)


Political, economic, regulatory, professional (eg, medicolegal), and sociocultural context for program rollout 5.07 (1.08) 5.33 (4.50-6.00)

aConstructs are reported on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree).

bA mean of ≤4 suggests that the particular domain may be a barrier; a mean of >4 suggests the domain may be an enabler.