Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 26;8:100069. doi: 10.1016/j.metop.2020.100069

Table 2.

TCF7L2 rs7903146 genotype association with GDM.

Model
Genotype No GDM GDM Crude analysis
p trend Adjusted analysis∗
OR (95% CI) p trend AIC
All (n = 857) OR (95% CI) AIC
Codominant C/C 316 (46.1%) 94 (54.6%) 1.00 0.038 858.8 1.00 0.09 825.3
C/T 308 (45%) 59 (34.3%) 0.64 (0.45–0.92) 0.69 (0.47–1.01)
T/T 61 (8.9%) 19 (11.1%) 1.05 (0.60–1.84) 1.12 (0.62–2.02)
Dominant C/C 316 (46.1%) 94 (54.6%) 1.00 0.046 859.4 1.00 0.13 825.7
C/T-T/T 369 (53.9%) 78 (45.4%) 0.71 (0.51–0.99) 0.76 (0.53–1.08)
Recessive C/C–C/T 624 (91.1%) 153 (89%) 1.00 0.4 862.6 1.00 0.33 827.2
T/T 61 (8.9%) 19 (11.1%) 1.27 (0.74–2.19) 1.33 (0.76–2.35)
Overdominant C/C-T/T 377 (55%) 113 (65.7%) 1.00 0.011 856.9 1.00 0.03 823.4
C/T 308 (45%) 59 (34.3%) 0.64 (0.45–0.91) 0.68 (0.47–0.97)



Log-additive 0.86 (0.66–1.11) 0.25 862 0.90 (0.69–1.19) 0.47 827.6

Genotype distributions are shown as n(%) and odds ratio 95% CI (OR). CI, confidence interval; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; AIC, Values of Akaike’s Information Criterion; P-trend values were calculated from adjusted or unadjusted logistic regression analysis for codominant, dominant, and recessive models. ∗Adjusted logistic regression by age, ethnicity, parity, family history of DM and pregestational BMI.