Table 3.
No GDM | GDM | ∗Crude OR (95% CI) | ∗Adjusted OR (95% CI) | †Crude OR (95% CI) | †Adjusted OR (95% CI) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
rs7903146 C/C | Low adherence | 46 (76.6) | 14 (23.3) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Moderate adherence | 231 (77.0) | 69 (23.0) | 0.98 (0.51–1.89) | 0.83 (0.42–1.66) | 0.98 (0.51–1.89) | 0.83 (0.42–1.64) | |
High adherence | 39 (78.0) | 11 (22.0) | 0.93 (0.38–2.27) | 1.06 (0.42–2.72) | 0.93 (0.38–2.27) | 1.06 (0.42–2.72) | |
rs7903146 C/T + T/T | Low adherence | 49 (68.0) | 23 (31.9) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.54 (0.71–3.35) | 1.53 (0.67–3.47) |
Moderate adherence | 269 (84.0) | 51 (15.9) | 0.40 (0.23–0.72) | 0.39 (0.21–0.741 | 0.62 (0.32–1.22) | 0.60 (0.29–1.21) | |
High adherence | 50 (92.6) | 4 (7.4) | 0.17 (0.05–0.52) | 0.15 (0.05–0.48) | 0.26 (0.08–0.84) | 0.23 (0.07–0.77) | |
p-interaction | 0.035 | 0.025 | 0.035 | 0.025 |
Data are n(%) Logistic regression analysis by genotype subgroups evaluating degree of adherence to the six food targets and risk of GDM; p-interaction: logistic regression analysis evaluating interactions between degree of adherence and genotypes. ∗ Analysis with no GDM and Low adherence as reference; †Analysis with no GDM, Low adherence and C/C genotype as reference.