Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 26;8:100069. doi: 10.1016/j.metop.2020.100069

Table 3.

Association between late first-trimester degree of adherence to the six food targets and GDM risk stratified by TCF7L2 rs7903146 genotype. Interaction analysis between genotypes and adherence (n = 856, in crude and adjusted by age, ethnicity, parity, family history of DM and BMI).

No GDM GDM ∗Crude OR (95% CI) ∗Adjusted OR (95% CI) †Crude OR (95% CI) †Adjusted OR (95% CI)
rs7903146 C/C Low adherence 46 (76.6) 14 (23.3) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Moderate adherence 231 (77.0) 69 (23.0) 0.98 (0.51–1.89) 0.83 (0.42–1.66) 0.98 (0.51–1.89) 0.83 (0.42–1.64)
High adherence 39 (78.0) 11 (22.0) 0.93 (0.38–2.27) 1.06 (0.42–2.72) 0.93 (0.38–2.27) 1.06 (0.42–2.72)



rs7903146 C/T + T/T Low adherence 49 (68.0) 23 (31.9) 1.00 1.00 1.54 (0.71–3.35) 1.53 (0.67–3.47)
Moderate adherence 269 (84.0) 51 (15.9) 0.40 (0.23–0.72) 0.39 (0.21–0.741 0.62 (0.32–1.22) 0.60 (0.29–1.21)
High adherence 50 (92.6) 4 (7.4) 0.17 (0.05–0.52) 0.15 (0.05–0.48) 0.26 (0.08–0.84) 0.23 (0.07–0.77)
p-interaction 0.035 0.025 0.035 0.025

Data are n(%) Logistic regression analysis by genotype subgroups evaluating degree of adherence to the six food targets and risk of GDM; p-interaction: logistic regression analysis evaluating interactions between degree of adherence and genotypes. ∗ Analysis with no GDM and Low adherence as reference; †Analysis with no GDM, Low adherence and C/C genotype as reference.