Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 25;20:101250. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101250

Table 2.

Prevalence ratios (PR)a of sleep qualityb according to weekly frequency of muscle-strengthening exercise (MSE) among German adults from the in the German Health Update 2014 survey (n = 23,602).

Sleep qualityb MSE (times/week) Model Ac Prevalence ratio (95% CI) Model Bd Prevalence ratio (95% CI) Model Ce Prevalence ratio (95% CI)
Fairf 0 1 (reference) 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
1 1.00 (0.94–1.06) 0.99 (0.93–1.05) 0.99 (0.93–1.06)
2 1.03 (0.97–1.10) 1.03 (0.96–1.09) 1.03 (0.97–1.04)
3–4 0.97 (0.91–0.95) 0.97 (0.90–1.09) 0.97 (0.90–1.10)
≥5 0.88 (0.80–0.95) 0.87 (0.80–0.95) 0.88 (0.80–0.96)
Poorf 0 1 (reference) 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
1 0.83 (0.73–0.94) 0.82 (0.72–0.93) 0.83 (0.73–0.94)
2 0.90 (0.79–1.02) 0.90 (0.79–1.02) 0.91 (0.80–1.03)
3–4 0.82 (0.72–0.94) 0.82 (0.71–0.94) 0.82 (0.71–0.94)
≥5 0.77 (0.65–0.90) 0.78 (0.65–0.92) 0.77 (0.65–0.91)
Very Poorf 0 1 (reference) 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
1 0.60 (0.51–0.70) 0.57 (0.48–0.67) 0.57 (0.47–0.67)
2 0.69 (0.59–0.80) 0.69 (0.59–0.81) 0.70 (0.59–0.81)
3–4 0.60 (0.59–0.80) 0.59 (0.49–0.71) 0.58 (0.48–0.70)
≥5 0.69 (0.57–0.83) 0.71 (0.58–0.85) 0.68 (0.55–0.83)
a

Prevalence ratio calculated using Poisson regression with a robust error variance.

b

Sleep Quality assessed by response to a single item question: “Over the last 2 weeks, how often have you had trouble falling or staying asleep, or sleeping too much”. Response options were: (i) ‘Not at all’ (good); (ii) ‘On some days’ (fair); (iii) ‘More than half of the days’ (poor); and (iv) ‘Almost every day’ (very poor).

c

Model A: unadjusted PR.

d

Model B: adjusted PR: sex, age, socioeconomic status, hazardous alcohol consumption, self-rated health, body mass index, being restricted by chronic disease in the past 6 months and depressive symptom severity.

e

Model C: adjusted for Model B + aerobic MVPA.

f

Reference category = good sleep quality.