Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ethn Health. 2020 Jun 5;27(3):565–583. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2020.1771681

Table 3.

Bivariate Associations between Decisional Needs and Screening-Related Intention Variables (N = 119)

Discuss Screening with Doctor Discuss Screening with Family Discuss Screening with Friends Screening Intention1 N = 64
Decisional Needs Variable Neutral/Unlikely N=19 Extremely/Somewhat Likely N=95 Neutral/Unlikely N=31 Extremely/Somewhat Likely N=85 Neutral/Unlikely N=41 Extremely/Somewhat Likely N=68 Neutral/Unlikely N=15 Extremely/Somewhat Likely N=46
Lung Cancer Knowledge, mean (sd) 7.6 (2.0) 7.1 (1.7) 7.2 (1.8) 7.1 (1.8) 7.3 (1.7) 7.2 (1.7) 7.8 (1.5) 7.0 (1.7)
Decisional Conflict, mean (sd) 2.5 (1.3) 2.8 (1.2) 2.4 (1.3) 2.9 (1.2)+ 2.3 (1.3) 3.0 (1.1)** 2.2 (1.1) 2.8 (1.2)+
Decisional Values, mean (sd)
Pros of Screening 19.1 (3.9) 22.9 (2.9)*** 20.3 (4.8) 22.7 (3.2)** 20.7 (4.2) 23.2 (2.2)*** 20.1 (3.8) 22.2 (4.3)**
Cons of Screening 25.6 (7.0) 29.1 (5.3)* 26.3 (7.3) 29.1 (5.4)+ 25.8 (6.3) 30.0 (4.7)*** 26.3 (7.4) 27.7 (6.5)

Note. Groups were compared by Mann-Whitney U-test α=.10. Discuss screening with doctor (N=5 missing); Discuss screening with family (N=3 missing); Discuss screening with friends (N=10 missing); Screening intention (N=3 missing)

1

Among participants with 20+ pack years (N=64)

+

p<.10

*

p< .05

**

p< .01

***

p< .001