Skip to main content
. 2019 May 22;2019:3264872. doi: 10.34133/2019/3264872

Table 3.

Correlations between fresh weight at 7 days after treatment (DAT7) and phenomic traitsa across 12 Brassica genotypes under nonstress (control), drought, heat and combined heat, and drought stress conditions. Traits without significant correlations (p ≥ 0.05) are not shown.

Trait Control Drought Heat Combined
Qy_DAT3 -0.421
T1_DAT1 0.472
T1_DAT5 0.515 ∗∗
T1_DAT7 0.519 ∗∗
T2_DAT5 0.421
T2_DAT7 0.444 0.490 0.480
T3_DAT5 0.429 -0.414
LC_DAT7 -0.471
VolWP_DAT3 0.944 ∗∗ 0.889 ∗∗ 0.928 ∗∗ 0.795 ∗∗
VolWP_DAT7 0.958 ∗∗ 0.914 ∗∗ 0.960 ∗∗ 0.716 ∗∗
VolF_DAT3 0.608 ∗∗ 0.764 ∗∗ 0.532 ∗∗
VolF_DAT7 0.473 0.810 ∗∗ 0.574 ∗∗

a Phenomic traits are indicated as phenomics parameter at different days after treatment (DAT); phenomics parameters include (i) six in-cabinet rapid phenotyping traits: photochemical reflectance index (PRI), photosystem II quantum yield (Qy), leaf conductance (LC), and temperature difference between (a) bud and ambient environment (T1), (b) leaf and ambient environment (T2), and (c) bud and leaf (T3); (ii) three photosynthetic traits derived from A/Ci curves: maximum carboxylation rate allowed by Rubisco (Vcmax), photosynthetic electron transport rate (ETR), and the rate of triose phosphate use (TPU); and (iii) two plant growth imaging derived phenotyping traits: whole plant volume (VolWP) and flower volume (VolF).

b Correlation (r) significance values are shown as p <0.05 () and <0.01 (∗∗).