Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 5;22(4):567–574. doi: 10.1007/s40368-020-00591-1

Table 1.

Comparison of participants’ demographic characteristics at baseline, of those followed up and those lost to follow-up

Variable All (n = 167) Followed up (n = 85) Lost to follow-up (n = 82) p-value
Age, years
 Range 5–14 5–11 5–14 0.14
 Mean (± SD) 6.70 (± 1.69) 6.49 (± 1.53) 6.91 (± 1.83)
Gender
 Male 79 (47.3%) 38 (44.7%) 41 (50.0%) 0.49
 Female 88 (52.7%) 47 (55.3%) 41 (50.0%)
Ethnicity
 White British 121 (72.5%) 62 (72.9%) 59 (72.0%) 0.89
 BME 46 (27.5%) 23 (27.1%) 23 (28.0%)
Deprivation (based on IMD score)
 Least deprived 10 (6.0%) 6 (7.1%) 4 (4.9%) 0.46
 Less deprived 19 (11.4%) 10 (11.8%) 9 (11.0%)
 Average 16 (9.6%) 7 (8.2%) 9 (11.0%)
 More deprived 36 (21.5%) 14 (16.5%) 22 (26.8%)
 Most deprived 86 (51.5%) 48 (56.5%) 38 (46.3%)
Safeguarding concern
 No 138 (82.6%) 77 (90.6%) 61 (74.4%) 0.19
 Yes 20 (12.0%) 8 (9.4%) 12 (14.6%)
 Data missing 9 (5.4%) 0 9 (11.0%)

Numbers, with percentages in brackets, are given unless otherwise stated

SD standard deviation; p−values are for comparisons between the followed−up and lost to follow−up groups. As the data were not normally distributed, the Mann–Whitney U test was used to test for significant difference between the groups. Pearson’s Chi−squared test was used to test for difference in categorical variables. There were no statistically significant results. BME black or minority ethnic group