Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 23;11:574535. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.574535

Table 1.

Blood perfusion changes, infarct area proportion, and vascular injury area proportion in different treatment groups (mean ± SD)a.

Swimming (min) CPSM (mg kg−1) Blood perfusion changes (PU) Infarct area proportion (%) Vascular injury area proportion (%)
Sham-operated −24.65 ± 5.87 0 0
0 0 −137.72 ± 34.39 11.90 ± 3.05 27.65 ± 8.92
0 237 −146.10 ± 30.38 10.90 ± 1.86 23.35 ± 6.25
0 474 −119.81 ± 30.40 10.13 ± 3.06 22.05 ± 4.78
20 0 −119.86 ± 29.95 10.62 ± 3.18 20.92 ± 6.59
20 237 −116.98 ± 29.27 8.32 ± 2.80 15.21 ± 3.67
20 474 −112.65 ± 31.49 10.28 ± 2.85 21.58 ± 6.32
40 0 −118.70 ± 21.68 4.76 ± 1.04 20.54 ± 6.49
40 237 −78.47 ± 23.27 7.45 ± 1.43 11.54 ± 1.33
40 474 −127.28 ± 44.34 4.89 ± 1.47 18.15 ± 6.23
Two-way ANOVA F p F p F p
Swimming 4.86 0.01 21.73 <0.001 7.87 <0.001
CPSM 0.31 0.73 0.39 0.68 6.70 <0.001
CPSM × swimming 3.36 0.02 0.55 0.70 1.67 0.17
a

All data are expressed as the mean ± SD. The GLM procedure was applied for a two-way ANOVA to test for synergy. Comparisons between each pair of factor levels were analyzed using a Bonferroni post hoc test. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.