Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 7;24:678. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03414-3

Table 2.

Comparison of respiratory mechanics and PEEP titration in supine position, for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome induced or not by coronavirus disease-19

C-ARDS (n = 17) NC-ARDS (n = 13) p value
Respiratory mechanics
 Respiratory rate (breath/min) 30 [28, 35] 31 [29, 31] 0.74
 Tidal volume (ml/kg of PBW) 6.1 [5.9, 6.3] 6.2 [6.0, 6.3] 0.58
 CRS at low PEEP (mL/cmH2O) 40 [32, 47] 35 [26, 38] 0.07
 Airway opening pressure (cmH2O) 2 [0, 4] NA
 Recruitment-to-inflation ratio 0.46 [0.33, 0.52] NA
 PaO2/FiO2 before EIT explorations (mmHg) 133 [96, 180] 120 [110, 137] 0.40
EIT-PEEP titration
 Best PEEPa (cmH2O) 12 [9, 12] 9 [6, 9] < 0.01
 Hyperdistension at PEEP 18 cmH2O, % 24 [17, 30] 35 [25, 41] 0.02
 AUC for hyperdistension 111 [68, 136] 193 [119, 226] 0.03
 Collapse at PEEP 6 cmH2O, % 27 [20, 35] 13 [7, 19] < 0.01
 AUC for collapse 94 [59, 141] 45 [31, 61] < 0.01

aDefined using EIT as the smallest sum of hyperdistension and collapse. Continuous variables are expressed as median [interquartile range]

C-ARDS coronavirus disease-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome, NC-ARDS noncoronavirus disease-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome, PBW predicted body weight, CRS respiratory system compliance, PEEP positive end-expiratory pressure, EIT electrical impedance tomography, AUC area under the curve, NA not available