Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 7;24:678. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03414-3

Table 3.

Comparison of patients with coronavirus disease-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome associated with lower versus higher respiratory system compliance

Compliance ≥ 40 mL/cmH2O (n = 9) Compliance < 40 mL/cmH2O (n = 8) p value
Body mass index (kg/m2) 29.8 [27.9, 33.1] 30.3 [24.4, 33.4] 0.67
Time from first symptoms to exploration (days) 9 [6.5, 12] 10 [9, 11] 0.63
PaO2/FiO2 before EIT (mmHg) 138 [89, 182] 130 [118, 150] 0.96
Respiratory system compliance (mL/cmH2O) 47 [46, 52] 31.5 [29, 37] < 0.01
Recruitment-to-inflation ratio 0.48 [0.41, 0.62] 0.4 [0.31, 0.49] 0.25
Increase in PaO2/FiO2 after proning (mmHg) 52.5 [38, 91] 52 [12, 68] 0.53
Duration of proning (h) 18.5 [18, 21] 18 [17.5, 20.5] 0.87
EIT-PEEP titration
Best PEEPa (cmH2O) 12 [12] 12 [9, 13.5] 0.92
AUC for compliance 444 [345, 513] 293 [260, 316]  < 0.01
Hyperdistension at PEEP 18 (%) 23 [17, 31] 25 [18, 27] 0.70
AUC for hyperdistension 111 [68, 141] 108 [78, 131] 0.81
Collapse at PEEP 6 (%) 29 [21, 39] 24 [19 – 31] 0.61
AUC for collapse 104 [59, 141] 78 [66, 115] 0.74

aDefined using EIT as the smallest sum of hyperdistension and collapse. Continuous variables are expressed as median [interquartile range]

PEEP positive end-expiratory pressure, EIT electrical impedance tomography, AUC area under the curve