Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 12;106(24):1919–1926. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-316612

Table 3.

ANCOVA results comparing baseline and 3-month follow-up scores for QoL measures

All patients
(n=518)
Recurrent AT/AF
(n=154)
No recurrent AT/AF
(n=364)
P value
EQ-5D total
 Baseline 0.79 (0.22) 0.78 (0.21) 0.79 (0.22)
 End of study 0.83 (0.20) 0.78 (0.21) 0.84 (0.20)
 Change 0.04 (0.21) 0.00 (0.21) 0.05 (0.21) 0.131
SF-12 mental component
 Baseline 49.78 (9.61) 50.07 (9.22) 49.67 (9.78)
 End of study 51.79 (9.24) 49.94 (9.72) 52.58 (8.93)
 Change 2.01 (9.26) −0.12 (9.09) 2.91 (9.19) 0.065
SF-12 physical component
 Baseline 44.31 (9.07) 42.57 (9.07) 45.04 (8.98)
 End of study 47.40 (8.69) 44.43 (9.33) 48.66 (8.09)
 Change 3.10 (8.24) 1.86 (8.93) 3.62 (7.88) 0.238
Karnofsky
 Baseline 86.3 (10.2) 85.8 (11.2) 86.5 (9.8)
 End of study 93.2 (9.7) 90.6 (11.4) 94.3 (8.6)
 Change 7.0 (9.7) 4.9 (9.6) 7.9 (9.6) <0.001
MoCA
 Baseline 26.6 (2.8) 27.1 (2.5) 26.3 (2.9)
 End of study 27.2 (2.8) 27.7 (2.6) 27.0 (2.9)
 Change 0.6 (2.5) 0.6 (2.3) 0.7 (2.6) 0.924

The p value in this table corresponds to the effect of recurrent AT/AF group in an ANCOVA model with change from baseline as the dependent variable, and baseline values and recurrent AT/AF group as covariates.

AF, atrial fibrillation; ANCOVA, analysis of covariance; AT, atrial tachycardia; MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; QoL, quality of life.