Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan;11(1):204–214. doi: 10.21037/qims-19-998

Table 4. Comparison of different CT values and nodule sizes between MIA and IAC appearing as PSNs.

Variable MIA (n=10) IAC (n=70) P value
CT value of GGC (HU) −630.0±34.1 −612.0±66.7 0.407
rCT value 1 of GGC (HU) 282.6±11.8 301.5±63.3 0.029*
rCT value 2 of GGC 0.69±0.02 0.67±0.07 0.042*
CT value of SC (HU) −89.79±15.34 −49.8±61.94 0.047*
rCT value 1 of SC (HU) 822.81±48.07 863.67±83.4 0.135
rCT value 2 of SC 0.10±0.02 0.06±0.07 0.067
Size of PSN (cm) 1.88±0.60 1.95±0.62 0.736
Size of SC (cm) 0.84±0.43 0.90±0.49 0.711
SC/GGC ratio 0.44±0.16 0.45±0.17 0.854
CT value of lung (HU) −912.6±34 −913.5±26 0.923

Cases of nodules shown in brackets. *, P<0.05. CT, computed tomography; GGC, ground-glass component; HU, Hounsfield units; PSN, part-solid nodule; SC, solid component.