Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan;11(1):317–327. doi: 10.21037/qims-20-723

Table 5. Grading efficacy of parameters based on static O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine positron emission tomography imaging between different glioma grades.

Parameters Grades II+III vs. IV Grade II vs. III Grade II vs. IV Grade III vs. IV
TBRmax 0.0006* 0.348451 0.000324** 0.005331**
TBRpeak 0.0004* 0.429037 0.000305** 0.003077**
TBRmean 0.0021* 0.328791 0.001021** 0.012724
COV 0.001* 0.303379 0.000521** 0.009635***
HI 0.0005* 0.318267 0.000278** 0.005861**
MTV 0.0014* 0.178946 0.000456** 0.020645
TLU 0.0003* 0.144722 0.000085** 0.010712
SUVsd 0.0045* 0.195083 0.000273** 0.010712

*, P<0.05 indicated statistical significance based on Wilcoxon rank sum test results. **, adjusted P<0.008333 indicated statistical significance based on the Kruskal-Wallis test results. ***, adjusted P=0.009635 indicated around statistical borderline based on the Kruskal-Wallis test results. COV, coefficient of variation; HI, heterogeneity index; MTV, metabolic tumor volume; SUVsd, standard deviation of lesion standardized uptake value; TBRmax, maximal tumor-to-background ratio; TBRmean, mean tumor-to-background ratio; TBRpeak, peak tumor-to-background ratio; TLU, total lesion tracer standardized uptake.