Table 1.
Hair cell no. | Initial stiffness, μN·m−1 | Stiffness after EDTA exposure, μN·m−1 | Stiffness after recovery, μN·m−1 | Endolymph Ca2+ concentration, μM |
1* | 490 ± 26 | 211 ± 13 | 311 ± 14 | 25 |
2* | 339 ± 17 | 171 ± 14 | 211 ± 10 | 25 |
3* | 501 ± 24 | 217 ± 12 | 322 ± 15 | 250 |
4 | 365 ± 19 | 205 ± 11 | 320 ± 26 | 250 |
5 | 1,039 ± 85 | 246 ± 12 | 860 ± 53 | 250 |
6 | 478 ± 17 | 292 ± 10 | 415 ± 16 | 250 |
7 | 452 ± 13 | 269 ± 11 | 302 ± 14 | 250 |
Each stiffness was estimated by measuring the flexion of a flexible glass fiber attached at the hair bundle’s tip during sinusoidal stimulation. Asterisks indicate bundles subjected to step displacements; the remainder were displaced with ramps. Values are reported as means ± SDs for 21 determinations. For the entire sample, the stiffness decreased significantly after exposure with respect to the initial value (P < 0.007). After the negative displacements, the stiffness recovered significantly with respect to the exposed value (P < 0.04). If we disregard the cell (number 5) with an exceptionally high stiffness, the corresponding values show still greater significance (P = 0.0001 and P < 0.002, respectively).