Table 5.
Comparison of MGMT and GLUT2 scores of primary tumors with metastatic lesions
| Case No.a | Primary site | Grade | Ki-67 labeling index | GLUT2 score | MGMT score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| case 1 | Stomach | G2 | 10.9264 | 4 | 2 |
| Lymph node | G2 | 3.10345 | 0 | 2 | |
| case 2 | Duodenum | G2 | 3.52588 | 2 | 3 |
| Lymph node | G2 | 3.46821 | 2 | 3 | |
| Liver | G2 | 5.02431 | 1 | 3 | |
| case 3 | Stomach | G2 | 3.7929 | 4 | 1 |
| Lymph node | G2 | 4.47471 | 4 | 1 | |
| case 4 | Rectum | G2 | 6.83572 | 6 | 1 |
| Lymph node | G3 | 31.5287 | 0 | 1 | |
| case 5 | Rectum | G2 | 11.0251 | 0 | 1 |
| Liver | G2 | 4.13534 | 0 | 1 | |
| case 6 | Rectum | G1 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Liver | G2 | 3.37972 | 0 | 1 |
aPatient characteristics of these cases: male, n = 3; female, n = 3 / Median age in years (range), 65.5 (41–67)