Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 23;55(Suppl 3):1107–1117. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13581

TABLE 2.

Racial and ethnic disparities on quality and utilization measures

Black‐White total disparity Hispanic‐White total disparity API‐White total disparity
Absolute difference Better care (P < .05) Absolute difference Better care (P < .05) Absolute difference Better care (P < .05)
Process
Breast cancer screening, % 3.6 Black 8.3 White 4.9 White
Colorectal cancer screening, % 2.1 Black 4.2 White 1.2 White
Diabetes eye examination, % 1.0 Black 8.7 White 5.2 API
Medication adherence
Diabetes medications, % 10.5 White 11.3 White 0.7 Neither
Antidepressant medications, % 17.6 White 26.2 White 15.1 White
Continuity and coordination
Continuity of care, % 1.1 Black 2.5 Hispanic 3.9 API
Follow‐up after ED visit, % 7.7 White 3.2 White 0.6 Neither
Follow‐up after hospitalization, % 2.9 White 0.1 Neither 0.8 Neither
Follow‐up after hospitalization for mental illness, % 12.4 White 7.4 White 2.8 Neither
Utilization
Emergency department visits, per 100 beneficiaries 5.3 White 4.5 White 14.2 API
All‐cause readmissions, % 0.1 Black 1.7 White 1.5 White
One or more ACSC hospitalizations, % 0.5 White 0.2 Hispanic 0.7 API

The absolute value of the racial or ethnic difference in quality of care is reported. All results are statistically significant at P < .05 after adjustment for multiple comparisons except when indicated by the word “Neither.” Bold results reflect an effect size exceeding 0.2 standard deviations (for binary or continuous measures) or a disparity exceeding 5 percentage points (for binary measures).

Abbreviations: ACSC, Ambulatory care‐sensitive condition; ED, Emergency Department.