Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 7;15(12):e0243523. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243523

Table 7. Simplified presentation of separate hierarchical regression analyses for perceived usefulness and adherence for the eight countries.

Measures usefulness Adherence to rules
FR GE PL RU ES SV UK US FR GE PL RU ES SV UK US
Step 1
Gender -X -X -X -X -X -X -X -X -X -X
Age group X X X X X X X X X X X
Marital status -X X -X X
Children (-X) -X
Social status X X X X X X
Living environment -X -X
Step 2
Risk group X X X X X (X)
Affected: Health X X X X X X X X X
Affected: Economically -X X X X X
Affected: Mentally X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
Communication: Clear & understandable X X X
Communication: Credible & honest X X X X X
Communication: Guided by interests of people X X (X) X
Feel: …well supported X X -X
Feel: …well informed X X X X X X X (X) X X X
Feel: …taken seriously X (X) -X X
Feel: …left alone -X -X -X -X -X -X
Physical health state -X -X
Positive mental health X X X X
Overall adjusted R2 (%) 24.3 37.8 23.1 29.7 26.8 42.3 10.8 12.1 8.6 19.5 19.4 19.9 7.5 14.3 n.s. 13.9

France (FR): N = 940, Germany (GE): N = 917, Poland (PL): N = 924, Russia (RU): N = 986, Spain (ES): N = 960, Sweden (SV): N = 922, the U.K. (UK): N = 1,105, the U.S. (US): N = 904; gender: 0 = woman, 1 = man; -X = significant negative predictor, X = significant positive predictor, both:**p < .01 and *p < .05; (-X)/(X) = (*)p < .06.