Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 7;11(12):e00278. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000278

Table 3.

Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and positive and negative likelihood ratios for the Rome IV, Rome III, and potential Asia criteria

graphic file with name ct9-11-e00278-g007.jpg

Sensitivity (%) (95% CI) Specificity (%) (95% CI) Positive predictive value (%) (95% CI) Negative predictive value (%) (95% CI) Positive likelihood ratio (95% CI) Negative likelihood ratio (95% CI)
Rome IV FD (n = 381) 67.3 (60.7–74.0) 38.4 (33.6–43.1) 34.6 (29.9–39.5) 70.8 (64.7–76.9) 1.09 (0.97–1.24) 0.85 (0.67–1.08)
Rome III FD (n = 438) 78.6 (72.8–84.4) 29.7 (25.2–34.2) 35.2 (30.7–39.7) 74.1 (67.3–80.9) 1.12 (1.01–1.23) 0.72 (0.50–1.04)
Asia FD (n = 525) 85.2 (80.2–90.2) 11.4 (8.3–14.5) 31.8 (27.8–35.8) 61.3 (50.1–72.6) 0.96 (0.90–1.03) 1.30 (0.84–2.00)

CI, confidence interval; FD, functional dyspepsia.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure