TABLE 1.

Results from the context‐dependent interaction

		MNI
Location	Hemisphere	x	y	z	t	Cluster size
High > low predictable sentences
Middle cingulate cortex	R	3	–34	38	7.49	159
Middle cingulate cortex	L	–4	–30	42	7.17	Subcluster
Middle temporal gyrus	L	−60	−52	−5	6.85	150
Middle temporal gyrus	L	−54	−62	2	6.6	Subcluster
Angular gyrus (PFm/PGa)	L	−42	−62	50	6.47	135
Angular gyrus (PGa)	L	−42	−70	42	6.31	Subcluster
Angular gyrus (PGp)	L	−34	−77	42	6.02	Subcluster
Angular Gyrus (PGp)/middle occipital gyrus	L	−34	−77	30	6.34	51
Angular gyrus (PGp)	L	−42	−77	28	5.63	Subcluster
Supramarginal gyrus	L	−60	−30	30	5.91	26
Inferior temporal gyrus	L	−47	−52	−25	5.82	21
Precuneus	L	−10	−47	55	5.62	15
Low > high predictable sentences
Presupplementary motor area/paracingulate gyrus	R/L	0	16	50	7.72	138
Inferior frontal gyrus (p. orbitalis, area 45)	L	−42	26	−10	6.47	106
Insular cortex	L	−30	26	−2	6.43	Subcluster
Inferior frontal gyrus (p. triangularis, area 45)	L	−50	23	5	5.9	Subcluster
Inferior frontal gyrus (p. triangularis, area 45)	L	−44	20	0	5.88	Subcluster
Insular cortex	R	30	26	−2	6.13	24
Inferior frontal gyrus (p. triangularis, BA 45)	L	−57	20	15	5.71	16
Inferior frontal gyrus (p. triangularis, BA 45)	L	−50	20	18	5.07	Subcluster

Note: High > low predictable sentences: Regions showing greater activity for high as compared to low predictable sentences under increasing intelligibility; Low > high predictable sentences: Regions showing greater activity for low as compared to high predictable sentences under increasing intelligibility. Regions are reported at a peak‐level FWE‐correcting threshold at an alpha of .05. Seed regions for DCM analyses are highlighted in bold.