Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 30;2020:7294574. doi: 10.1155/2020/7294574

Table 3.

Stepwise regression analysis of association between social capital and PCS.

PCS
β (95% CI)
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Individual and family social capital scale 0.04 (-0.15, 0.24) 0.02 (-0.18, 0.22) -0.08 (-0.28, 0.11)
Community and society social capital scale 0.06 (-0.25, 0.38) 0.12 (-0.20, 0.44) 0.28 (-0.03, 0.59)
Age group (years)
 50-59 Reference Reference
 60-69 -1.89 (-4.03, 0.25) 0.13 (-2.10, 2.36)
 ≥70 -5.69 (-8.45, -2.92) ∗∗∗ -3.56 (-6.51, -0.59)
Sex
 Male Reference Reference
 Female -1.16 (-3.25, 0.93) -0.29 (-0.33, 2.74)
Education attainment
 Illiteracy Reference
 Primary school 3.34 (0.67, 6.01)
 Junior high school or above 5.39 (2.43, 8.35) ∗∗∗
Employment status
 Employed Reference
 Retired -2.24 (-5.65, 1.18)
 Unemployed -2.69 (-5.14, -0.24)
Average monthly personal income (in RMB)
 None Reference
 <1,000 0.78 (-2.72, 4.29)
 1,000-1,999 5.12 (1.38, 8.87) ∗∗
 ≥2,000 4.84 (0.69, 8.99)
Route of HIV transmission
 Sexual behavior with the spouse Reference
 Sexual behavior with a nonspouse opposite-sex partner -0.44 (-3.65, 2.77)
 Sexual behavior with a same-sex partner 0.59 (-4.64, 5.82)
 Blood transfusion 1.02 (-3.71, 5.75)

p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001. Boldfaced numbers indicate p < 0.05. Model 1: including either IF-based social capital or CS-based social capital as an independent variable. Model 2: including two social capital scales, age, and sex. Model 3: including two social capital scales and covariates marginally significant (p < 0.1) in respective univariate analysis (age, sex, education attainment, employment status, monthly personal income, and route of HIV transmission). RMB: renminbi.