Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 8.
Published in final edited form as: Head Neck. 2012 Sep 26;34(12):1681–1703. doi: 10.1002/hed.23136

TABLE 1.

Comparative view of transoral robotic surgery study parameters.

TORS study Oropharynx only No. of patients Included previously treated patients Follow-up, mo (mean)
Sinclair69 Yes 54 Yes 12/54 (22%) 13 (range, 2–?)
Moore12 Yes 45 No 12.3 (range, 1–16)
Genden66 No (90% oropharynx) 30 No 20.4 (range, 12.8–39.6)
Hurtuk67 No (90.6% oropharynx) 64 N/A 11.8 (range, 2–29)
Leonhardt68 Yes 38 Yes 2/38 (5.3%) 15.2 (range, 10–21)

Abbreviations: TORS, transoral robotic surgery; N/A, not available.