Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 7;10:21378. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78294-2

Figure 4.

Figure 4

MIA induces sustained changes in behavior that can show weak correlations with microglial tip process directionality. (a, b) Averaged effects of MIA induced at E12 or E15 on (a) the proportion of time spent in the center of the open field or (b) on the total distance traveled in the open-field test (n = 16 mice in each group). (c, d) Averaged effects of MIA induced at E12 or E15 on (c) the time spent sniffing, or (d) following, a novel mouse in the social interaction test (n = 16 mice in each group). Columns represent the mean ± standard deviation, while dots show data from each mouse. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 and N.S.: not significant, unpaired t-test. (e) Experimental scheme showing two-photon imaging and behavioral assay before and after LPS injection. (f, g) Plot of the relationship between behavioral phenotypes and microglial directionality in individual P42 offspring from E12 (f) and E15 (g) MIA mice, before (black dots) and after (red dots) LPS injection. The regression line plots the linear correlation between the two variables; the time spent following was significantly correlated with directionality (P = 0.031, r = 0.75, n = 8 mice, Pearson’s correlation test). For all plots, n = 4 mice before LPS and 4 mice after LPS.