Table 5.
Bland Altman analysis, Pearson’s correlation, and Lin concordance coefficients, of mean absorbed doses delivered to both tumoral liver and individual tumors volumes among the studied dosimetry methods (PM, MTPM, LDM, and DPK)
| Bland-Altman | Correlation and concordance coefficients | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bias [95%CI] (Gy) | ρ | ρc | ||
| Tumor volume | ||||
| PM-MTPM | − 0.7 | − 32.5; 31.0 | 0.94 | 0.92 |
| PM-DPK | 5.6 | − 17.2; 28.5 | 0.95 | 0.94 |
| PM-LDM | 6.7 | − 15.8; 29.2 | 0.95 | 0.93 |
| MTPM-DPK | 6.3 | − 12.7; 25.4 | 1.00 | 0.96 |
| MTPM-LDM | 7.4 | − 14.1; 28.9 | 0.99 | 0.94 |
| LDM-DPK | 1.1 | − 2.0; 4.1 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Individual tumors | ||||
| PM-MTPM | 4.7 | − 60.1; 69.5 | 0.55 | 0.55 |
| PM-DPK | 7.1 | − 52.2; 66.4 | 0.53 | 0.50 |
| PM-LDM | 7.9 | − 50.1; 65.8 | 0.53 | 0.50 |
| MTPM-DPK | 2.4 | − 10.6; 15.4 | 0.99 | 0.98 |
| MTPM-LDM | 3.2 | − 11.8; 18.1 | 0.99 | 0.97 |
| LDM-DPK | 0.8 | − 2.0; 3.5 | 1.00 | 1.00 |