Table 2.

Conditional indirect effects of workplace/school microaggressions to negative affect outcomes via problem-focused thoughts by levels of vertical individualism

	Outcome: Depressive Symptoms
Conditional Indirect Effects	β	95% CI
Vertical Individualism Level: High (1 SD)	.068	[.032, .107]
Vertical Individualism Level: Average	.028	[.002, .057]
Vertical Individualism Level: Low (−1 SD)	−.013	[−.054, .031]
Indirect Effect Differences	β	95% CI
High Vertical Individualism vs. Low Vertical Individualism	.081	[.023, .138]
High Vertical Individualism vs. Average Vertical Individualism	.041	[.012, .069]
Average Vertical Individualism vs. Low Vertical Individualism	.041	[.012, .069]
	Outcome: Anxiety (Worry)
Conditional Indirect Effects	β	95% CI
Vertical Individualism Level: High (1 SD)	.112	[.055, .170]
Vertical Individualism Level: Average	.045	[.001, .092]
Vertical Individualism Level: Low (−1 SD)	−.021	[−.084, .050]
Indirect Effect Differences	β	95% CI
High Vertical Individualism vs. Low Vertical Individualism	.133	[.041, .218]
High Vertical Individualism vs. Average Vertical Individualism	.067	[.020, .109]
Average Vertical Individualism vs. Low Vertical Individualism	.067	[.020, .109]
	Outcome: Stress Symptoms
Conditional Indirect Effects	β	95% CI
Vertical Individualism Level: High (1 SD)	.105	[.047, .164]
Vertical Individualism Level: Average	.043	[−.001, .089]
Vertical Individualism Level: Low (−1 SD)	−.019	[−.085, .050]
Indirect Effect Differences	β	95% CI
High Vertical Individualism vs. Low Vertical Individualism	.124	[.034, .211]
High Vertical Individualism vs. Average Vertical Individualism	.062	[.017, .105]
Average Vertical Individualism vs. Low Vertical Individualism	.062	[.017, .105]

Note. Significant effects are in bold typeface for emphasis and were determined by a 95% bias-corrected bootstrapped confidence interval (based on 10,000 bootstrapped samples) that does not contain zero.