Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2020 Jul 26;44(9):1769–1782. doi: 10.1111/acer.14407

Table 1–

Effects of CNO and vehicle treatment in GFP-expressing rats

Test Reward Type M-CNO M-Veh F-CNO F-Veh
Mean (SEM) Mean (SEM) Mean (SEM) Mean (SEM)

Homecage 15% sucrose (ml/2hr) 69.76 (4.94) 66.58 (7.56) 81.27 (16.75) 81.07 (16.48)
10% EtOH (g/kg/2hr) 2.63 (0.38) 2.42 (0.29) 3.01 (0.25) 2.55 (0.33)
20% EtOH (g/kg/2hr) 1.54 (0.17) 1.43 (0.11) 2.10 (0.15) 1.94 (0.22)

FR1 Operant 15% sucrose (trials initiated) 127.50 (27.47) 137.00 (27.15) 124.00 (15.42) 134.17 (10.05)
10% EtOH (trials initiated) 48.00 (9.25) 33.17 (11.07) 33.83 (6.15) 49.00 (9.02)
20% EtOH (trials initiated) 35.17 (6.12) 28.33 (6.82) 27.83 (2.83) 31.00 (6.69)
15% sucrose (rewards collected) 124.83 (17.45) 133.33 (27.6) 114.33 (27.58) 128.83 (10.81)
10% EtOH (rewards collected) 41.50 (11.70) 28.33 (6.49) 22.83 (9.3) 34.17 (10.23)
20% EtOH (rewards collected) 34.00 (5.93) 27.00 (7.14) 21.50 (3.25) 23.00 (6.92)

Cued-Reinstatement 10% EtOH (total nosepokes) 13.17 (2.77) 19.00 (1.69) 19.17 (4.84) 16.83 (4.19)
10% EtOH (trials initiated) 10.83 (1.21) 14.17 (2.77) 16.17 (4.05) 19.17 (2.77)
10% EtOH (latency to initiate trial) 569.95 (132.41) 540.77 (181.77) 558.88 (131.68) 559.85 (148.23)
10% EtOH (total well entries) 154.00 (34.25) 166.00 (44.23) 169.83 (43.89) 172.50 (38.61)
10% EtOH (well entries after cue) 5.83 (2.56) 8.33 (0.88) 7.00 (1.16) 10.67 (4.06)
10% EtOH (latency to enter well) 1.41 (0.16) 1.26 (0.17) 1.37 (0.17) 1.26 (0.15)

Mean and SEM of results of CNO and vehicle treatment for each behavioral measure in male and female rats expressing virally-transduced GFP as a control. The same data are presented here as are presented in graphical format for DREADD-expressing rats. All comparisons of CNO vs. vehicle treatment were non-significant except one: 10% EtOH (trials initiated). The details of these results are described in the text.