Table 2.
Characteristics and results of included studies
| Authors (country) | Study design | Setting, participants | Person-centred care measure | Staff outcomes: measurement tool | Results |
| den Boer et al47 (Netherlands) | Cross-sectional | Community care, registered nurses (RNs) n=153 |
Adapted version of the Patient- Centred Care Questionnaire 35 items | Job satisfaction: a 38-item job satisfaction questionnaire | Job satisfaction: significant positive association with PCC |
| Dichter et al56 (Germany) | Quasi-experimental 6-month and 18- month follow-up |
Nursing home, caregivers n=201 |
The subscale ‘recognition of personhood’ of the Approach to Dementia Questionnaire (ADQ) 11 items | Job satisfaction: Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire 4-items Burnout: Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI) 6-items |
Job satisfaction: significant positive effect of PCC intervention Burnout: no significant effect of PCC intervention |
| Edvardsson et al53 (Australia) | Cross-sectional | Residential aged care, all staff n=297 |
Person-Centred Care Assessment Tool (P-CAT), 13 items | Job satisfaction: measure of job satisfaction (MJS) 22 items |
Job satisfaction: significant positive association with PCC |
| Edvardsson et al40 (Sweden) | Quasi-experimental 12 months follow-up |
Residential aged care, all staff n=171 (baseline) n=143 (follow-up) |
P-CAT 13 items Person-Centred Climate Questionnaire-Staff version (PCQ-S) 14 items |
Stress of conscience: Stress of Conscience questionnaire (SCQ) 9 items Job strain: Demand-Control-Support Questionnaire (DCSQ) 11 items |
Stress of conscience: significant negative effect of PCC intervention Job strain: no significant effect of PCC intervention |
| Elfstrand Corlin and Kazemi46 (Sweden) | Cross-sectional | Nursing homes, all staff n=322 |
Individualized Care Inventory (ICI) 43 items | Job satisfaction: a single question | Job satisfaction: significant association to subscales of PCC |
| Jeon et al54 (Australia) | Cluster randomised controlled trial 8 months follow-up |
Residential aged care, all staff n=194 |
Burnout: Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) 22 items | Burnout: significant effect of DCM intervention but not the PCC intervention | |
| Lehuluante et al41 (Sweden) | Cross-sectional | Hospital, RNs n=206 |
PCQ-S 14 items | Job satisfaction: satisfaction with nursing care and work scale 34 items | Job satisfaction: significant association to subscales of PCC |
| Lewis et al51 (USA) | Cross-sectional | Safety net clinic, all staff n=603 |
5 PCMH subscales 22 items | Job satisfaction: a single question Burnout: a single question |
Job satisfaction: significant association to subscales of PCC Burnout: significant association to subscales of PCC |
| Nocon et al52 (USA) | Quasi-experimental 4-year follow-up |
Safety net clinic, all staff n=536 (baseline) n=589 (postintervention) |
5 PCMH subscales 24 items | Job satisfaction: a single question Burnout: a single question |
Job Satisfaction: no significant effect of PCC intervention Burnout: no significant effect of PCC intervention |
| Wallin et al44 (Sweden) | Cross-sectional | Residential aged care, nurse assistants and nurse’s aides n=225 |
P-CAT 13 items, PCQ-S 14 items | Job satisfaction: Job Satisfaction Questionnaire 20 items |
Job satisfaction: significant positive association with PCC |
| Røen et al55 (Norway) | Cross-sectional | Nursing homes, managers, unit head nurses and staff n=175 |
P-CAT 13 items | Job satisfaction: a single question work-related psychosocial factors: the General Nordic Questionnaire for Psychosocial and Social Factors at Work 32 items |
Job satisfaction: significant association to PCC Work-related psychosocial factors: significant association to PCC |
| Schaap et al48 (Netherlands) | Quasi- experimental 14 months follow-up |
Residential aged care, all staff n=227 |
P-CAT 13 items | Job satisfaction: the Maastricht Work Satisfaction Scale in Health Care 21 items Burnout: MBI 6 items |
Job satisfaction: no significant effect of PCC intervention Burnout: no significant effect of PCC intervention |
| Silén et al42 (Sweden) | Cross-sectional | Nursing home, all staff n=212 |
P-CAT 13 items, PCQ-S 14 items | Work-related psychosocial factors: Swedish version of the Conditions of Work Effectiveness Questionnaire 19 items | Work-related psychosocial factors: significant association with PCC |
| Sjögren et al43 (Sweden) | Cross-sectional | Residential aged care, all staff n=1169 |
P-CAT 13 items, PCQ-S 14 items | Job satisfaction: Satisfaction with Nursing Care and Work Scale 34 items Stress of Conscience: SCQ 9 items Job strain: DCSQ 11 items |
Job satisfaction: significant positive association with PCC Stress of conscience: significant negative association with PCC Job stress: significant negative association with PCC |
| Van der Meer et al49 (Netherlands) | Cross-sectional | Residential aged care, all staff n=466 |
8 dimensions Person-Centred Care Questionnaire 35 items | Job satisfaction: MJS 38 items | Job satisfaction: significant positive association with PCC |
| Vassbø et al57 (Sweden, Norway, Australia) | Cross-sectional | Nursing homes, all staff n=341 |
P-CAT 13 items, PCQ-S 14 items | Job satisfaction: MJS 37 items | Job satisfaction: significant positive association with PCC |
| Willemse et al50 (Netherlands) | Cross-sectional | Nursing homes, all staff n=1147 |
The subscale ‘recognition of personhood’ of ADQ 11 items | Job satisfaction: 3-item scale derived from the Leiden Quality of Work Questionnaire. Burnout: MBI 8 items. Intent to leave: Subscale Leiden Quality of Work Questionnaire 3 items |
Job satisfaction: significant association to PCC Burnout: significant association to PCC Intent to leave: significant association to PCC |
| Åhlin et al45 (Sweden) | Longitudinal cohort study 1-year follow-up |
Residential aged care, RNs and nurse assistants n=488 |
PCQ-S 14 items | Stress of conscience: SCQ 9 items | Stress of conscience: no significant association to PCC |
PCC, person-centred care.