Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 7;4(1):e000856. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000856

Table 1.

Proficiency level identification (number of scenarios and resulting percentage correctly identified in proficiency category)

OSCE Proficiency level n Rater 1 Rater 2 Rater 3 Rater 4 Rater 5 Rater 6
All 42
Poor 10 10 (100%) 10 (100%) 10 (100%) 10 (100%) 10 (100%) 9 (90%)
Average 18 8 (44%) 9 (50%) 9 (50%) 5 (28%) 8 (44%) 8 (44%)
Excellent 14 10 (71%) 7 (50%) 10 (71%) 8 (57%) 11 (79%) 10 (71%)
BAB 15
Poor 6 6 (100%) 6 (100%) 6 (100%) 6 (100%) 6 (100%) 5 (83%)
Average 3 2 (66%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (66%) 2 (66%)
Excellent 6 3 (50%) 1 (17%) 3 (50%) 2 (33%) 5 (83%) 3 (50%)
ECEB 12
Poor 2 2 (100%) 2 (100%) 2 (100%) 2 (100%) 2 (100%) 2 (100%)
Average 6 0 (0%) 3 (50%) 3 (50%) 1 (17%) 2 (33%) 3 (50%)
Excellent 4 4 (100%) 4 (100%) 4 (100%) 4 (100%) 4 (100%) 4 (100%)
HBB 15
Poor 2 2 (100%) 2 (100%) 2 (100%) 2 (100%) 2 (100%) 2 (100%)
Average 9 6 (67%) 6 (67%) 6 (67%) 4 (44%) 4 (44%) 3 (33%)
Excellent 4 3 (75%) 2 (50%) 3 (75%) 2 (50%) 2 (50%) 3 (75%)

BAB, Bleeding after Birth; ECEB, Essential Care for Every Baby; HBB, Helping Babies Breathe; OSCE, Objective Structured Clinical Examination.