Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 7;4(1):e000856. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000856

Table 2.

Proficiency level identification: (average and excellent categories combined) for training programme categories (number of scenarios and resulting percentage correctly identified in proficiency category)

OSCE Proficiency level n Rater 1 Rater 2 Rater 3 Rater 4 Rater 5 Rater 6
All 42
Poor 10 10 (100%) 10 (100%) 10 (100%) 10 (100%) 10 (100%) 9 (90%)
Average 32 18 (56%) 16 (50%) 19 (59%) 14 (44%) 19 (59%) 18 (56%)
BAB 15
Poor 6 6 (100%) 6 (100%) 6 (100%) 6 (100%) 6 (100%) 5 (83%)
Average 9 5 (55%) 1 (11%) 3 (33%) 2 (22%) 7 (78%) 5 (66%)
ECEB 12
Poor 2 2 (100%) 2 (100%) 2 (100%) 2 (100%) 2 (100%) 2 (100%)
Average 10 4 (40%) 7 (70%) 7 (70%) 5 (50%) 6 (60%) 3 (50%)
HBB 15
Poor 2 2 (100%) 2 (100%) 2 (100%) 2 (100%) 2 (100%) 2 (100%)
Average 13 9 (69%) 8 (62%) 9 (69%) 6 (46%) 6 (46%) 6 (46%)

BAB, Bleeding after Birth; ECEB, Essential Care for Every Baby; HBB, Helping Babies Breathe; OSCE, Objective Structured Clinical Examination.