Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 8;11:6266. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20133-z

Fig. 1. Identification and characterization of tgw1.

Fig. 1

a Representative images of main tiller spikes from WT or tgw1. Scale bar = 1 cm. b Average length of main spikes from WT and tgw1. n = 11. c–d Comparison of width and length of mature grains from WT or tgw1. Scale bar = 1 cm. e Average grain weight in WT and tgw1. n = 80. f Representative images of grain endodermal cells in WT and tgw1. Scale bar = 100 μm. g Average width of grain endodermal cell in WT (n = 17) and tgw1 (n = 11). h The average area of flag leaves in WT and tgw1 mutant. n = 10. i Leaf epidermal cells in WT or tgw1 mutant. Scale bar = 100 μm. j Average chlorophyll units in flag leaves from WT and tgw1 mutant. n = 10. Data in e are represented as boxplots. The boxplots indicate median (middle line), 25th, 75th percentile (box), and 5th and 95th percentile (whiskers) as well as outliers (single points). Data in b, e, g, h, and j are represented as mean ± SEM, and p values are indicated by two-tailed unpaired t test. Results in f and i are representative of three independent samples. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.