TABLE 4.
Days | Groups |
Color Mean ± SD |
Odor Mean ± SD |
Texture Mean ± SD |
Total acceptance Mean ± SD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | Control | 12.00 ± 0.00 | 12.00 ± 0.00 | 12.00 ± 0.00 | 12.00 ± 0.00 |
3 |
Control Treatment 1 Treatment 2 |
8.34 ± 0.05 a 9.13 ± 0.04 b 10.21 ± 0.03 c |
8.25 ± 0.03 a1 11.19 ± 0.03 b1 11.5 ± 0.05 c1 |
10.5 ± 0.08 a2 11.5 ± 0.04 b2 11.5 ± 0.04 c2 |
10 ± 0.04 a3 11 ± 0.07 b3 11 ± 0.08 c3 |
6 |
Control Treatment 1 Treatment 2 |
5.40 ± 0.06 a 6.25 ± 0.04 b 8.05 ± 0.05 c |
6.13 ± 0.03 a1 9.28 ± 0.03 b1 9.5 ± 0.03 c1 |
7.5 ± 0.03 a2 9 ± 0.04 b2 9 ± 0.06 c2 |
8 ± 0.05 a3 9 ± 0.04 b3 10 ± 0.06 c3 |
9 |
Control Treatment 1 Treatment 2 |
2. 5 ± 0.05 a 4 ± 0.05 b 6.5 ± 0.06 c |
4 ± 0.04 a1 7 ± 0.04 b1 7 ± 0.06 c1 |
5 ± 0.05 a2 7.5 ± 0.2 b2 7.5 ± 0.08 c2 |
6. 5 ± 0.04 a3 7.5 ± 0.1 b3 8 ± 0.04 b3 |
Control sample: Polypropylene (PP), Treatment 1: PP/3% ZnO NPs/4A Z/GTE and Treatment 2: PP/6% ZnO NPs/4A Z/GTE. 4A Z: 4A zeolite and GTE: green tea extract.
Data are presented as mean ± SD and analyzed with one‐way analysis of variance. Different letters in each day represent statistical significance among different treatments using the Tukey.