Table 2. AGREE II domain and overall assessment for eligible guidelines.
| Guideline ID | Domain 1: scope and purpose | Domain 2: stakeholder involvement | Domain 3: rigour of development | Domain 4: clarity of presentation | Domain 5: applicability | Domain 6: editorial independence | Overall assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raghu G (23) | 74.07% | 66.67% | 60.42% | 79.63% | 34.72% | 71.43% | R |
| Raghu G (2) | 83.33% | 72.22% | 68.06% | 83.33% | 48.61% | 77.14% | R |
| Cottin V (24) | 48.15% | 77.78% | 29.17% | 66.67% | 40.28% | 60.00% | NR |
| Behr J (25) | 74.07% | 75.93% | 55.56% | 68.52% | 51.39% | 48.57% | R |
| Xaubet A (26) | 27.78% | 5.56% | 6.25% | 16.67% | 4.17% | 25.71% | NR |
| Xaubet A (27) | 31.48% | 5.56% | 7.64% | 22.22% | 4.17% | 8.57% | NR |
| Funke-Chambour M (28) | 85.19% | 42.59% | 31.94% | 79.63% | 27.78% | 2.86% | NR |
| Homma S (29) | 85.19% | 83.33% | 67.36% | 81.48% | 20.83% | 68.57% | R |
| Lee SH (30) | 79.63% | 55.56% | 57.64% | 61.11% | 5.56% | 57.14% | RM |
| NICE (31) | 87.04% | 81.48% | 75.00% | 83.33% | 48.61% | 60.00% | R |
| Baddini-Martinez J (32) | 88.89% | 68.52% | 70.14% | 85.19% | 61.11% | 80.00% | R |
| Piotrowski WJ (33) | 87.04% | 87.04% | 81.25% | 88.89% | 62.50% | 88.57% | R |
| Mean, % (Range) | 70.99 (27.8–88.9) | 60.19 (5.6–68.5) | 50.87 (6.3–70.1) | 68.06 (16.7–85.2) | 34.14 (4.2–61.1) | 54.05 (25.7–80.0) | - |
| ICC (95%CI) | 0.88 (0.80–0.93) | 0.90 (0.84–0.95) | 0.91 (0.87–0.93) | 0.84 (0.74–0.91) | 0.86 (0.79–0.91) | 0.92 (0.84–0.96) | - |
R, recommended; RM, recommended with modifications; NR, not recommended.