Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 25;4(12):nzaa168. doi: 10.1093/cdn/nzaa168

TABLE 9.

Sensitivity and specificity results for the best indicator candidates for each of 9 individual recommendations, and for a dichotomous GDR score1

Candidate indicator Cutoff Percentage of observations ≥ cutoff Sensitivity Specificity Estimated minus actual population prevalence Percentage of false positives Percentage of false negatives Total percentage misclassified
Brazil
 WHO-FV ≥3 5.2 38.42 97.9 −3.3 1.9 5.2 7.2
 WHO-Fiber ≥4 23.0 67.8 81.1 −4.7 17.3 2.7 20.0
 WHO-Sugar3 ≥2 59.1 79.7 75.1 −3.4 9.4 12.7 22.1
 WHO-SatFat3 ≥2 42.1 64.0 69.1 8.2 20.4 12.2 32.62
 WHO-Fat3 ≥2 36.3 47.52 68.1 7.9 22.8 14.9 37.72
 Legumes ≥1 78.5 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
 Nuts and seeds ≥1 0.3 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
 Whole grains ≥1 21.7 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
 Processed meat3 ≥1 21.8 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
 GDR score4 ≥1 42.1 69.4 71.3 9.1 19.2 10.1 29.3
United States
 WHO-FV ≥3 14.5 56.4 90.3 4.2 8.7 4.5 13.2
 WHO-Fiber ≥4 21.8 57.6 82.4 4.8 15.8 4.4 20.2
 WHO-Sugar3,5 ≥2 60.9 81.9 67.4 3.4 13.8 10.4 24.3
 WHO-SatFat3 ≥2 59.1 72.7 56.0 6.6 20.9 14.3 35.22
 WHO-Fat 3 ≥2 71.7 79.2 40.72 9.4 22.3 13.0 35.32
 Legumes ≥1 21.4 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
 Nuts and seeds ≥1 16.7 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
 Whole grains6 ≥1 37.1 68.0 100.0 −17.42 0.0 17.4 17.4
 Processed meat3 ≥1 38.6 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
 GDR score4 ≥1 29.4 72.3 82.3 8.0 13.9 5.9 19.8
1

Values are percentage points for the estimated minus actual population prevalence and percentages for all other statistics. All values are based on unweighted data. GDR, Global Dietary Recommendations; HDI-2020, Healthy Diet Indicator 2020; WHO-FV, WHO-Fruits and Vegetables (score); WHO-SatFat, WHO-Saturated Fat (score).

2

Indicates results that fall outside the predefined criteria for acceptable results.

3

Higher scores for this candidate indicator indicate a lower probability that the respective recommendation will be met; therefore, the variable for meeting the recommendation was inverted in order to obtain test statistics that are comparable across all candidate indicators.

4

For the GDR score, the dichotomized HDI-2020 (1 = 6–11 global dietary recommendations met, 0 = 0–5 global dietary recommendations met) was used as the outcome variable.

5

For the United States, added sugars were used as a proxy for free sugars.

6

Intake of whole grains is calculated differently in the United States than in Brazil survey data; in the United States, the definition of whole-grain foods excludes some foods that may contain a small amount of whole grain, such as unspecified breads, cereals, chips, crackers, and muffins. This explains why whole-grain consumption based on the quantitative intake data does not match perfectly with the yes/no determination based on consumption of “whole grain foods.”