Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 3;32(4):170–181. doi: 10.5371/hp.2020.32.4.170

Table 1. Study Design, Study Period, Demographic Data of Included Studies.

Study Design Study period Mean follow-up period (mo) No. of patients Sex (male/female) Mean age (yr)
Watson et al.7) (2016) Retrospective 2011–2012 5 (2–8) 11 5/6 Not mentioned
TasyIkan et al.9) (2015) Retrospective 2006.1–2013.1 29.2±14.8 25 11/17 71±14.3
Hu et al.8) (2013) Retrospective 2008.1–2010.6 28.3 (24–40) 32 25/7 47.8 (25–71)
Massoud3) (2010) Prospective 2002.2–2007.2 12 13 9/4 68.9 (54–85)
Su et al.11) (2006) Retrospective 1992–2001 >12 28 5/23 79±11
Chen et al.1) (2008) Prospective 1992–2004 74.7 (24–150) 269 112/157 73.8 (58–90)
Saarenpää et al.10) (2002) Retrospective 1989.1–1996.12 60 (24–120) 30 11/19 75 in male/78 in female
Kuokkanen13) (1991) Retrospective 1977.1–1985.12 63 (21–111) 6 Not mentioned 76.7±11.48
Davis et al.12) (1990) Retrospective 1983.6–1985.5 Not mentioned 9 Not mentioned Not mentioned
Kweon et al.14) (2017) Retrospective 2012.7–2015.5 25.2 (24–31) 15 6/9 78.14 (65–87)
Lee et al.15) (2018) Retrospective 2003.5–2016.3 28.2±18.6 69 17/52 81.3±6.6
Guo et al.16) (2019) Retrospective 2015.1–2017.3 15 (12–21) 14 4/10 67.6 (56–93)
Wang et al.17) (2019) Retrospective 2013.1–2017.2 22.5 52 13/39 75.1 (63–91)
Kim et al.18) (2020) Retrospective 2011–2014 26.4 (12–43.2) 106 39/67 76.4 in DHS group/77.5 in CMN group
Yoo et al.19) (2019) Retrospective 2011.1–2016.6 At least 12 months of follow-up 185 48/137 78.5±7 in ITST nail, 79.5±7 in PFNA, 79.2±7.5 in Gamma

DHS: dynamic hip screw, CMN: cephalomedullary nail, ITST: intertrochanteric/subtrochanteric, PFNA: proximal femoral nail antirotation.