Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 29;26(3):369–380. doi: 10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_19_20

Table 1.

Overview of studies on medical usage of marijuana

Use of marijuana Study Type of study Sample size Comparator agent Study parameters Results Level of evidence Demerits
Nausea and Vomiting 1) Risto Johansson (1982) RCT 27 Prochlorperazine Number of Vomiting ejections between Cannabis and Prochlorperazine groups Lesser in Cannabis group as compared to Prochlorperazine, (P <0.001) Ib 1)Small sample size
2)Greater incidence of side effects with Cannabis
2) Chan HS, 1987 RCT 30 Prochlorperazine Rate of Improvement in Vomiting between Cannabis and Prochlorperazine groups Cannabis vs Prochlorperazine- 70% vs 30% (P=.003, chi 2 test) Ib 1)Small sample size
2)Greater incidence of side effects with Cannabis
3) Pomeroy M, 1986 RCT 38 Domperidone Number of Vomiting episodes between Cannabis and Domperidone groups Cannabis vs Domperidone, 4.76 vs 12.95 (P< 0.02) Ib 1)Small sample size
2)Greater incidence of side effects with Cannabis
4) Niederle N, 1986 RCT 20 Alizapride Number of episodes of vomiting between Cannabis and Alizapride groups Cannabis vs Alizapride, 1.1 vs 2.9 (P<0.01) Ib 1)Small sample size
2)Greater incidence of side effects with Cannabis
5) Niiranen A, 1985 RCT 24 Prochlorperazine Number of episodes of vomiting between Cannabis and Prochlorperazine groups Cannabis vs Prochlorperazine, 6.5 vs 11(P<0.05) Ib 1)Small Sample size
2)Cannabis use unpredictable 3)Greater incidence of side effects with Cannabis
6) Salllan 1975 RCT 22 Placebo Response between the Cannabis and Placebo groups Greater response in patients on Cannabis compared to Placebo Ib (p<0.001) Greater incidence of side effects with Cannabis Ib 1) Small sample size
2) Placebo controlled
3) No comparison between placebo and no placebo
7) Stephen E. Jones, 1982 RCT 54 Placebo Mean episodes of Vomiting between Cannabis and Placebo groups. Severity of Nausea between both groups Lesser number of Vomiting episodes and in patients receiving Cannabis over Placebo (P<0.001) Reduced Nausea in Cannabis group over placebo (P<0.001) Ib 1)Greater Incidence of side effects
2)Relatively small sample size
8) Jerry K. Wada (1982) RCT 112 Placebo Incidence of Nausea and Vomiting between the Cannabis and Placebo groups Nausea and Vomiting Reduced in Cannabis group as compared with placebo (P<0.001) Ib 1) Greater incidence and severe nature of side effects due to Cannabis
9) Duran M et al. 2010 RCT 16 Placebo Complete response in Vomiting between Cannabis and Placebo groups Complete Response between Cannabis and Placebo groups - 71.4% of patients vs 22% of patients (95% CI 1%, 75%) Ib 1) Small sample size.
2) Placebo controlled
10)Chang et al. RCT 15 Placebo Number of Vomiting and Retching episodes, Degree of Nausea, Duration of nausea and volume of emesis Cannabis significantly more effective than placebo all parameters (P<0.001) 1) Small sample size.
2) Placebo controlled
Appetite Stimulation 1)Beal JE 1995 RCT 139 Placebo Improvement in appetite above basement between Cannabis and placebo groups Increased appetite in Cannabis group as compared with Placebo (38% vs 8% for placebo, P=0.015) Ib 1)Placebo Controlled
2) Struwe M, 1993 RCT 12 Placebo Increase in percentage of body fat and trend towards weight gain between Cannabis and placebo groups Increased percent body fat in Cannabis group (one percent, P=0.04) Trends towards weight gain in cannabis group (0.5 kg, P=0.13) Ib 1)Small sample size
2)Placebo Controlled
Chronic Pain 1)Jeremy R. Johnsn, 2010 RCT 177 Placebo In patients suffering from Cancer, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score were compared between the Cannabis and Placebo groups Statistically significantly results in favor of Cannabis compared with placebo (improvement of −1.37 vs. −0.69, P<0.014) Ib 1)Placebo Controlled
2) Ronald J Ellis, 2009 RCT 28 Placebo Pain relief in patients suffering from Neuropathic pain between the Cannabis and Placebo groups Pain relief greater with cannabis than placebo (median difference in DDS pain intensity change, 3.3 points, effect size=0.60; P=0.016) Ib 1)Small Sample size
2)Placebo Controlled
3)Skrabek RQ, 2008 RCT 40 Placebo Visual analogue scale(VAS) in patients suffering from fibromyalgia Significant decrease in the VAS (-2.04, P < .02), in Cannabis group as compared to Placebo Ib 1)Comparatively small Sample size
2)Placebo Controlled
4) B Frank, 2008 RCT 96 Dihydrocodiene Pain compared using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) between Cannabis group and Dihydrocodeine group Mean score on VAS scale was 6.0 mm longer for Cannabis than for Dihydrocodeine (95% confidence interval 1.4 to 10.5) Ib 1)Greater side effects associated with Cannabis
Multiple Sclerosis 1) Zajicek, 2012 RCT 279 Placebo Spasticity compared using change in Ashworth score from baseline to 12 months between Cannabis group, Cannabis extract group and placebo Change in Ashworth score from baseline to 12 months in Cannabis=1·82 (n = 154, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53 to 3.12), cannabis extract=0.10 (n = 172, 95% CI −0.99 to 1.19), placebo=0.23 (n = 176, 95% CI −1.41 to 0.94); (P = 0.04) Ib 1)Placebo Controlled
2) Corey-Bloom, 2012 RCT 37 Placebo Muscle spasticity between Cannabis and Placebo groups compared using modified Ashworth scale Reduction in patient scores on the modified Ashworth scale by an average of 2.74 points with Cannabis more than placebo (P < 0.0001) Ib 1)Small Sample size
2)Placebo controlled
3) C. Collins 2006 RCT 189 Placebo Muscle spasticity compared between Cannabis and Placebo group primary efficacy analysis on the intention to treat (ITT) population (n=184) showed the Cannabis to be significantly superior to Placebo (P=0.048) Ib 1)Placebo Controlled
2)Greater incidence of adverse effects with Cannabis
Epilepsy 1) Devinsky et al. 2017 RCT 120 Placebo Median frequency of convulsive seizures in Children and young adults with the Dravet syndrome between Cannabis group or Placebo group median frequency of convulsive seizures per month decreased from 12.4 to 5.9 with Cannabis, as compared with a decrease from 14.9 to 14.1 with placebo (adjusted median difference between the Cannabis group and the placebo group in change in seizure frequency, −22.8 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], −41.1 to −5.4; P=0.01) Ib 1)Placebo Controlled
2)Greater incidence of Adverse effects with Cannabis
2) Thiele et al., 2018 RCT 171 Placebo Percentage change from baseline in monthly frequency of drop seizures during the treatment period in patients suffering from Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. median percentage reduction in monthly drop seizure frequency from baseline was 43·9% (IQR −69·6 to −1·9) in the cannibidiol group and 21·8% (IQR −45·7 to 1·7) in the placebo group The median percentage reduction in monthly drop seizure frequency from baseline was 43·9% (IQR −69·6 to −1·9) in the cannabis group and 21·8% (IQR −45·7 to 1·7) in the placebo group. The estimated median difference between the treatment groups was −17·21 (95% CI −30·32 to −4·09; P=0.0135) Ib Placebo controlled Statistically not significant results
Crohn’s Disease 1)Naftali T, 2013 RCT 20 Placebo Complete remission in symptoms were compared between Cannabis and placebo group Complete remission (CDAI score, <150) was achieved by 5 of 11 subjects in the cannabis group (45%) and 1 of 10 in the placebo group (10%; P=.43) Ib 1)Small sample size
2)Placebo controlled
Glaucoma 1)Tomida et al. 2006 RCT 6 Placebo Cannabis group and placebo groups were compared for Intraocular pressure Intraocular pressure in Cannabis group significantly lower than after placebo (23.5 mm Hg vs. 27.3 mm Hg, P=0.026) Ib 1)Small sample size
2)Placebo controlled
Tourrette Syndrome 1) Muller Vahl, 2003 RCT 20 Placebo Memory span was compared between Cannabis and placebo group using the German version of auditory verbal learning test (VLMT) Cannabis group was superior to the Placebo group (P<0.039) Ib 1)Small sample size
2)Placebo controlled
2) Muller Vahl, 2003 RCT 24 Placebo Cannabis and placebo groups were compared using various scales such as Tourette Syndrome Clinical Global Impressions scale (TS-CGI), Shapiro Tourette-Syndrome Severity Scale (STSSS), Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS), Self-rated Tourette Syndrome Symptom List (TSSL), Videotape-based rating scale. On various scales such as Significant difference (P <.05) or a trend toward a significant difference (P <.10) between Cannabis and placebo groups at visits 2, 3, and/or 4 Ib 1)Small sample size
2)Placebo controlled
3) Muller Vahl, 2002 RCT 12 Placebo Tics ad obsessive compulsive behavior (OCB) between Cannabis and placebo group. Significant improvement of tics (P=0.015) and obsessive-compulsive behavior (OCB) (P=0.041 in Cannabis vs Placebo Ib 1)Small sample size
2)Placebo controlled