Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 2;2020:9157430. doi: 10.1155/2020/9157430

Table 3.

Hazard ratios for the incidence of T2DM in different metabolic groups.

N T2DM cases Incidence density Unadjusted model Multivariable adjusted model#
HR (95% CI) P values HR (95% CI) P values
High LAP
 No 9,695 255 3.593 1.000 (ref) 1.000 (ref)
 Yes 5,652 597 14.710 4.243 (3.660-4.913) <0.001 4.094 (3.530-4.755) <0.001
HTGW
 No 13,662 576 5.781 1.000 (ref) 1.000 (ref)
 Yes 2,055 291 19.958 3.611 (3.136-4.158) <0.001 3.387 (2.929-3.916) <0.001
Central obesity
 No 10,208 307 4.106 1.000 (ref) 1.000 (ref)
 Yes 5,509 560 14.192 3.585 (3.119-4.121) <0.001 3.671 (3.163-4.260) <0.001
Increased BP
 No 8,705 311 4.858 1.000 (ref) 1.000 (ref)
 Yes 7,012 556 11.075 2.281 (1.986-2.621) <0.001 2.111 (1.820-2.448) <0.001
Increased FPG
 No 12,943 403 4.259 1.000 (ref) 1.000 (ref)
 Yes 2,774 464 23.668 5.747 (5.028-6.567) <0.001 5.532 (4.829-6.337) <0.001
Increased TG
 No 12,069 480 5.459 1.000 (ref) 1.000 (ref)
 Yes 3,648 387 14.715 2.777 (2.429-3.175) <0.001 2.719 (2.375-3.114) <0.001
Reduced HDL-C
 No 12,396 640 7.144 1.000 (ref) 1.000 (ref)
 Yes 3,321 227 9.212 1.194 (1.026-1.390) 0.022 1.209 (1.034-1.413) 0.017
MS
 No 13,120 473 4.937 1.000 (ref) (ref) 1.000 (ref) (ref)
 Yes 2,597 394 21.402 4.419 (3.866-5.052) <0.001 4.224 (3.671-4.860) <0.001
Number of MS components
 0 4,250 54 1.726 1.000 (ref) 1.000 (ref)
 1 4,909 125 3.496 2.014 (1.463-2.771) <0.001 1.996 (1.441-2.763) <0.001
 2 3,508 248 9.754 5.704 (4.249-7.656) <0.001 5.728 (4.238-7.741) <0.001
 3 2,032 239 16.381 9.589 (7.137-12.884) <0.001 9.437 (6.962-12.793) <0.001
 4 847 149 24.809 14.423 (10.564-19.691) <0.001 14.846 (10.774-20.458) <0.001
 5 171 52 44.734 26.219 (17.914-38.372) <0.001 24.652 (16.612-36.583) <0.001

Incidence density, per 1000 person-years; BP: blood pressure; FPG: fast plasma glucose; TG: triglyceride; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; MS: metabolic syndrome. #Adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, drinking status, physical activity, family history of T2DM, family income, and education. Grouped by optimal cutoff value (LAP = 27.90) calculating through ROC curve analysis, 370 (247 for men and 123 for women) subjects were excluded because of LAP less than 0.