Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 21;12:100197. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2020.100197

Table 1.

Biosecurity practices reported by 158 Australian wildlife rehabilitators when handling animals and cleaning animal enclosures. Results obtained from a survey conducted at the Australian Wildlife Rehabilitation Conference in Sydney in July 2018.

Number (%) of participants when handling animals Number (%) of participants when cleaning enclosures
Biosecurity practice
No PPE 5 (3.2) 5 (3.2)
Prompt hand washing 153 (96.8) 153 (96.8)
Overalls/protective outerwear 20 (12.7) 29 (18.4)
Disposable gloves 36 (22.8) 61 (38.6)
Safety glasses 5 (3.2) 10 (6.3)
Face mask 4 (2.5) 8 (5.1)



Level of biosecurity practicea
Inadequate 138 (87.3) 136 (86.1)
Adequate 12 (7.6) 19(12.0)
Enhanced 8 (5.1) 3 (1.9)
a

Level of biosecurity practice was based on reported personal protection equipment (PPE) use and recommendations from the Australian Veterinary Association Guidelines for Veterinary Personal Biosecurity [9] and National Wildlife Biosecurity Guidelines (Wildlife Health [69]).