Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 9;40(50):9725–9735. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1809-20.2020

Table 3.

Correlation of weight gain or weight loss with various neurophysiological parameters in the VP

Membrane potential AP frequency APs/+80 pA step Minimal latency to first AP (+20 pA step) eIPSC amplitude (% change after HFS) sIPSC amplitude sIPSC frequency (IEI) IPSC5\IPSC1 (50 HZ)
Weight gain *p = 0.01
r = 0.38
p = 0.06
r = −0.31
p = 0.56
r = −0.1
p = 0.62
r = −0.1
*p = 0.04
r = 0.45
p = 0.4
r = 0.14
p = 0.87
r = 0.03
p = 0.17
r = 0.25
Weight loss p = 0.54
r = 0.09
p = 0.15
r = 0.24
p = 0.84
r = 0.03
p = 0.88
r = 0.02
p = 0.87
r = 0.03
p = 0.34
r = 0.15
p = 0.31
r = 0.16
p = 0.54
r = 0.09

r, nonparametric Spearman correlation; weight gain, weight on the last day of HFHS diet expressed as percentage of weight on first day of HFHS diet; weight loss, weight on last day of the 2 weeks of chow following the HFHS diet expressed as percentage of weight on last day of HFHS diet; average weight loss, WG % weight loss (−9.257 ± 4.029% for WG mice; −10.83 ± 2.263% for NWG mice). AP, Action potential. The asterisk highlights the tests where p < 0.05.