Table 2.
Shape | Correlation | |
---|---|---|
Variance | w/Axial | |
PC | Explained | Length |
1 | – | 0.85*** |
2 | 40% | 0.75*** |
3 | 12% | 0.11 |
4 | 10% | 0.25 |
5 | 8% | –0.16 |
6 | 5% | –0.13 |
The first 6 principal components were found to explain 99.5% of the total variance in the data. The first principal component primarily accounts for variation across subjects in the mean tissue volume across the profile. Components 2 to 6 account for 75% of the remaining variation in the shape of the profile across subjects. The Pearson correlation of axial length with the weights on each of the components is also given (*** indicate correlations with significance P < 0.001; the remaining coefficients were found to be nonsignificant).