Table 6.
Results Compared with Existing Methods
Method | Year | MIoU | Se |
---|---|---|---|
Fang et al.38 | 2017 | 0.8709 | 0.8691 |
Roy et al.39 | 2017 | 0.8823 | 0.8911 |
Apostolopoulos et al.40 | 2017 | 0.8629 | 0.8723 |
He et al.42 | 2018 | 0.8812 | 0.8924 |
Sedai et al.43 | 2018 | 0.8845 | 0.9087 |
Shah et al.44 | 2018 | 0.8832 | 0.8992 |
Guo et al.45 | 2018 | 0.8854 | 0.9061 |
Hamwood et al.46 | 2018 | 0.8768 | 0.8829 |
Gholami et al.54 | 2018 | 0.8903 | 0.9194 |
Pekala et al.41 | 2019 | 0.8915 | 0.9078 |
Proposed method | 2020 | 0.9041 | 0.9215 |