TABLE 2.
Sexual Behaviors Stratified According to Changes in PrEP Use During COVID-19 Physical Distancing Restrictions Among People With a History of PrEP Use (N = 400)
| n % | Continued to Use PrEP During Physical Distancing Restrictions, n = 233 (58.3) | Stopped Using PrEP After Introduction of Physical Distancing Restrictions, n = 167 (41.8) | P |
| No. of sex partners before physical distancing restrictions | 0.339 | ||
| 0 sex partner before physical distancing restrictions | 3 (1.3) | 5 (3.0) | |
| 1 sex partner before physical distancing restrictions | 11 (4.7) | 11 (6.6) | |
| More than 1 sex partner before physical distancing restrictions | 219 (94.0) | 151 (90.4) | |
| No. of sex partners following physical distancing restrictions | <0.001 | ||
| 0 sex partner following physical distancing restrictions | 99 (42.5) | 111 (66.5) | |
| 1 sex partner following physical distancing restrictions | 73 (31.3) | 41 (24.6) | |
| More than 1 sex partner following physical distancing restrictions | 61 (26.2) | 15 (9.0) | |
| Casual partners following COVID-19 physical distancing restrictions | <0.001 | ||
| No recent casual partners | 178 (76.4) | 154 (92.2) | |
| Recent casual partners | 55 (23.6) | 13 (7.8) | |
| Fuckbuddies following COVID-19 physical distancing restrictions | <0.001 | ||
| No recent fuckbuddies | 165 (70.8) | 152 (91.0) | |
| Recent fuckbuddies | 68 (29.2) | 15 (9.0) | |
| Nonrelationship sexual partners | <0.001 | ||
| No sex with both fuckbuddies and casual partners during physical distancing restrictions | 143 (61.4) | 146 (87.4) | |
| Sex with fuckbuddy or casual partners during physical distancing restrictions | 90 (38.6) | 21 (12.6) |