Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec;15(6):901–909. doi: 10.26603/ijspt20200901

Table 4.

Comparison of magnitude variation between the training protocols. Values presented in median [IQR].

Δ% BFR Δ% TRAD p Eta Squared
AC (cm) 1.8 [-0.2 – 6.0] -0.3 [-2.0 – 1.5] 0.053 0.13
FC (cm) 0.2 [-2.5 – 1.8] 1.5 [-0.6 – 2.5] 0.232 0.05
AMC (cm) 2.0 [-0.1 – 8.8] -0.1 [-2.6 – 2.6] 0.056 0.14
RHGS (kgf) 5.0 [0.0 – 6.8] 5.1 [-2.5 – 15.1] 0.945 <0.01
LHGS (kgf) 8.7 [2.6 – 24.2] 14.9 [5.6 – 20.8] 0.550 0.01

BFR = blood flow restriction training group; TRAD = traditional training group; Δ% = Relative variation between pre and post measures. AC = arm circumference, FC = forearm circumference, AMC = arm muscle circumference; RHGS = right handgrip strength, LHGS = left handgrip strength;