Table 3.
22q11DS−PS (n = 30) |
22q11DS+PS (n = 21) |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sub-circuit | Tract | dMRI indices | r | p-Value | FDR | r | p-Value | FDR |
Left DLPFC sub-circuit | Thalamus-rMFG | FA | 0.298 | n.s. | n.s. | – | – | – |
Striatum-rMFG | FA | 0.219 | n.s. | n.s. | −0.242 | 0.391 | n.s. | |
Striatum-rMFG | RD | −0.284 | n.s. | n.s. | 0.240 | 0.323 | n.s. | |
Left VLPFC sub-circuit | Thalamus-IFG | FA | 0.330 | n.s. | n.s. | −0.391 | 0.080 | n.s. |
Striatum-IFG | FA | – | – | – | −0.353 | 0.151 | n.s. | |
Thalamus-IFG | RD | −0.366 | n.s. | n.s. | 0.398 | 0.074 | n.s. | |
Striatum-IFG | RD | – | – | – | 0.403 | 0.097 | n.s. | |
Right DLPFC sub-circuit | Thalamus-rMFG | FA | 0.296 | n.s. | n.s. | – | – | – |
Striatum-rMFG | FA | 0.690 | n.s. | n.s. | −0.241 | 0.293 | n.s. | |
Striatum-rMFG | RD | −0.114 | n.s. | n.s. | 0.149 | 0.520 | n.s. | |
Right VLPFC sub-circuit | Thalamus-IFG | FA | −0.193 | n.s. | n.s. | −0.491 | 0.024 | 0.048 |
Striatum-IFG | FA | – | – | – | −0.250 | 0.301 | n.s. | |
Thalamus-IFG | RD | 0.129 | n.s. | n.s. | 0.487 | 0.025 | 0.050 | |
Striatum-IFG | RD | – | – | – | 0.151 | 0.537 | n.s. |
Note: Pearson correlation coefficients r are given. Numbers of participants range from 51 to 45. 22q11DS−PS = individuals with 22q11DS without prodromal symptoms. 22q11DS+PS = individuals with 22q11DS with prodromal symptoms. L = left. R = right. FA = fractional anisotropy. RD = Radial Diffusivity. FDR = false discovery rate-adjusted p. The connections between thalamus-rMFG and striatum-rMFG represent the DLFPC sub-circuit of the fronto-striatal circuit, whereas thalamus-IFG and striatum-IFG represent the VLPFC sub-circuit. Results of p ≤ 0.05 are given in bold.
FDR was used to correct for multiple comparisons per sub-circuit (i.e., the DLPFC- and VLPFC-loops) and dMRI indices separately. Accordingly, the correction for multiple comparisons was made for two tracts within each sub-circuit.