Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 4;2020(1):10–17. doi: 10.1182/hematology.2020000168

Table 3.

Available evidence for standard of care treatment strategies after venetoclax discontinuation for progression or intolerance

Subsequent therapy Study design Number of patients in group of interest Clinical setting Prior therapies, median (range) ORR Progression data on subsequent therapy Survival data on subsequent therapy
Venetoclax or venetoclax/rituximab Prospective9 14 Progression after fixed-duration venetoclax/rituximab (13 completed MURANO regimen, 1 discontinued early) Not reported 55% (of evaluable patients) Not reported Not reported
Ibrutinib Prospective41 8 Progression after fixed-duration venetoclax/rituximab 1 (1-4) 100% 4 on treatment, 3 with PD (median time on ibr 15 mo (3-48)) No deaths reported
Retrospective44 27 Venetoclax discontinuation (18 with PD, 9 for other reasons) 2 (0-9) 56% 9 patients progressed on ibrutinib, time on ibrutinib 3-53 mo Not reported
Retrospective27 6 Progression on venetoclax 4 (1-7) 5/6 with PR 3 of 6 remain on therapy (6, 13, and 16 mo on therapy) 3 deaths (2 of toxicity, 1 due to progression)
BTKi Retrospective28 44 Venetoclax discontinuation (progression, toxicity), BTK naïve 2 (0-8) 84% Median PFS 32 mo Not reported
Retrospective28 30 Venetoclax discontinuation (progression, toxicity), BTK exposed (33% intolerant, 66% resistant) 4 (1-11) 53% Median PFS 12 mo Not reported
Retrospective42 23 Venetoclax resistance, BTK naïve 4 (2-9) 91% Median PFS 34 mo
PI3Ki Retrospective28 17 Venetoclax discontinuation (progression, toxicity), BTK exposed, PI3K naive 4 (1-6) 47% Median PFS 5 mo Not reported