Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 26;13(23):5355. doi: 10.3390/ma13235355

Table 3.

Numerical calculated values of  Chkl¯, q1 and q2 for the most common slip systems in titanium [20].

Slip System Slip Plane Burger Vector C¯hk.0 q1 q2
Basal <a> (0002) [112¯0] 0.20227 −0.101142 −0.102623
Prismatic <a> (11¯00) [112¯0] 0.35387 −1.19272 0.355623
Prismatic <c> (11¯00) [0001] 0.04853 3.61619 1.226411
Prismatic <c + a> (11¯00) [112¯3] 0.10247 2.01717 −0.616631
Pyramidal1<a> (101¯1) [112¯0] 0.3118 −0.89401 0.183311
Pyramidal2 <c + a> (112¯2) [112¯3] 0.09227 1.29905 0.397247
Pyramidal3 <c + a> (112¯1) [112¯3] 0.09813 1.89412 −0.365739
Pyramidal4 <c + a> (101¯0) [112¯3] 0.09323 1.52702 0.146150
Screw <a> Multiple [112¯0] 0.1444 0.59492 −0.710368
Screw <c + a> Multiple [112¯3] 0.41873 1.25714 −0.94015
Screw <c> Multiple [0001] 3.61 × 10−6 165366 −98611