Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 3;9:e62618. doi: 10.7554/eLife.62618

Figure 2. Weakened motion-evoked surround suppression of SACs in Gabra2 cKO and Vgat cKO mice.

(a) Example Vm traces from a control SAC during moving bar in noise-free (left) and noisy background (right). For noise-free condition, lighter traces are three individual sweeps and darker trace represents the mean. For noisy condition, three individual sweeps are shown. For each sweep, the flickering checkerboard pattern was randomly generated and differed from those of other sweeps. Horizontal line indicates the resting membrane potential Vrest calculated as the mean baseline Vm under the noise-free condition. Vertical dashed lines mark the surround suppression time window. Insets: Upper left: schematic of the center-surround RF structure of a SAC. Upper right: the time windows during which the bar moved outside the RF (‘Baseline’), in the RF surround (Sur) and center (‘Center’). (b) Same as a, from a SAC in the Gabra2 cKO group. (c) Same as a, from a SAC in the Vgat cKO group. (d-f): summary plots for noisy-free background.d.Mean Vm during the Baseline time window indicated in a. In noisy-free background it is equivalent to the resting membrane potential Vrest.e.Mean hyperpolarization calculated as the mean Vm during the Surround time window relative to Vrest.f.Peak depolarization calculated as the peak Vm during the Center time window relative to Vrest. (g-i): summary plots for noisy backgroundg.Mean Vm during the Baseline window relative to Vrest.h.Mean Vm during the Surround window relative to Vrest.i.Peak Vm during the Center time window relative to Vrest.Control, n = 15 cells from four mice. Gabra2 cKO, n = 15 cells from four mice. Vgat cKO, n = 15 cells from four mice. See also Figure 2—figure supplement 1.

Figure 2—source data 1. Weakened motion-evoked surround suppression of SACs inGabra2cKO and Vgat cKO mice.

Figure 2.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1. Weakened motion-evoked surround suppression of SACs in Gabra2 cKO and Vgat cKO mice during contracting ring stimulus.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1.

(a) Example Vm traces (baseline adjusted) from three SACs (Control, black; Gabra2 cKO, red; Vgat cKO, blue) during contracting ring stimuli. The ring was centered on the soma and moved inward at a speed of 265 µm/s. Resting membrane potential Vrest calculated as the mean baseline Vm of a 500 ms time window before visual stimuli was presented to the retina. Insets: Upper left: schematic of the center-surround RF structure of an SAC. (b) Mean Vm during the Baseline time window. Box plots represent minimum/first quartile/median/ third quartile/maximum values for this and subsequent figures, grey dots represent individual cells. (c) Peak depolarization calculated as the peak Vm relative to Vrest. (d) Peak hyperpolarization calculated as the valley of Vm during relative to Vrest when contracting rings stimulates the surround of the SAC. (e) Duration of hyperpolarization phase when contracting ring activates the surround of SAC. The duration of hyperpolarization is defined as the total period of Vm hyperpolarized by more than 1 mV when contracting ring moves in the surruond of the SAC. Control, n = 11 cells from five mice. Gabra2 cKO, n = 10 cells from four mice. Vgat cKO, n = 15 cells from three mice.
Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Flickering checkerboard-evoked DSGC response.