Table 5.
Performance comparisons of our proposed and the second-best baseline method [10] using both retrieval methods.
| Method | With class prediction | Without class prediction | |||||||
|
|
Accuracy, % | F1, % | mAPa, % | mARb, % | Accuracy, % | F1, % | mAP, % | mAR, % | |
| Owais et al [10] | 92.57 | 93.41 | 94.58 | 92.28 | 93.18 | 94.02 | 94.68 | 93.38 | |
| Proposed | 96.19 | 96.99 | 98.18 | 95.86 | 96.13 | 96.94 | 98.04 | 95.89 | |
amAP: mean average precision.
bmAR: mean average recall.