Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 27;14:571035. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.571035

Table 2.

Participants’ scores across the outcome variables.

Psychological questionnaire MOH patients Mean ± SD Healthy controls Mean ± SD p
DERS (total score) 91.64 ± 26.03 73.31 ± 18.34 p < 0.001
DERS (subscore nonaccept) 16.65 ± 7.09 13.1 ± 5.96 p = 0.01
DERS (subscore goals) 14.87 ± 4.91 12.95 ± 5.16 p = 0.066
DERS (subscore impulse) 13.22 ± 5.85 10.54 ± 3.94 p = 0.01
DERS (subscore aware) 15.62 ± 4.38 13.31 ± 4.46 p = 0.01
DERS (subscore strategies) 19.62 ± 8.06 14 ± 5.31 p < 0.001
DERS (subscore clarity) 11.66 ± 5.21 9.29 ± 3.13 p = 0.008
TAS-20 (total score) 53.9 ± 14.09 46.23 ± 10.7 p = 0.003
TAS-20 (subscore DIF) 20.87 ± 7.09 15.54 ± 5.7 p < 0.001
TAS-20 (subscore DDF) 13.81 ± 4.7 13.39 ± 4.31 p = 0.65
TAS-20 (subscore EOT) 19.23 ± 5.35 17.29 ± 5.05 p = 0.072
BIS-11 (total score) 61.85 ± 8.12 58.72 ± 10.08 p = 0.098
BIS-11 (subscore attention) 16.68 ± 2.52 14.93 ± 3.53 p = 0.006
BIS-11 (subscore no planning) 22.54 ± 4.17 23.62 ± 5.65 p = 0.062
BIS-11 (subscore motor) 19.62 ± 3.8 20.16 ± 4.27 p = 0.514
BDI-2 18.8 ± 11.4 9.9 ± 8.4 p < 0.001
Trait subset of STAI-Y 48.92 ± 12.11 36.79 ± 12.55 p < 0.001

Note: MOH, Medication Overuse Headache; DERS, Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale; NONACCEPT, non-acceptance of emotional responses; GOALS, difficulties engaging in goal-directed behavior; IMPULSE, impulse control difficulties; AWARE, lack of emotional awareness; STRATEGIES, limited access to emotion regulation strategies; CLARITY, lack of emotional clarity; TAS-20, Toronto Alexitimia Scale-20 item; DIF, Difficulty Identifying Feeling; DDF, difficulty describing feelings; EOT, externally oriented thinking; BIS, Barratt Impulsiveness Scale; BDI-2, Beck Depression Inventory 2; STAI-Y, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory.